Information on Result #509167
There is no (22, 130, 487)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 11263 513246 326457 107717 191083 962666 851505 881478 434083 253656 726276 892853 838500 322373 875113 469334 787934 106717 050870 470165 967569 > 9130
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (22, 131, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (22, 132, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (22, 133, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (22, 134, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (22, 135, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (22, 136, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (22, 137, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (22, 138, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (22, 139, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (22, 140, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (22, 141, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (22, 142, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (22, 143, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (22, 144, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (22, 145, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (22, 146, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 17 | No (22, 147, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 18 | No (22, 148, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 19 | No (22, 149, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 20 | No (22, 150, 487)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||