Information on Result #509215
There is no (45, 131, 1678)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 101793 730528 894894 514942 047850 852699 639626 467882 223898 327745 104527 709969 195882 185522 568886 752576 201374 071324 382511 682627 745425 > 9131
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (45, 132, 1678)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |