Information on Result #509252
There is no (46, 132, 1768)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 930710 254749 532953 767466 327414 578799 115561 707037 106990 357939 797310 013484 671672 891899 310470 169682 074189 291457 740873 879238 933185 > 9132
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (46, 133, 1768)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |