Information on Result #509400

There is no (46, 136, 1660)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 6125 353271 892730 207439 018741 740491 057744 742277 287894 334287 331955 226762 052745 768791 478479 663525 191891 666748 469927 480231 543691 348833 > 9136

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (46, 137, 1660)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction