Information on Result #509517
There is no (49, 139, 1926)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 4 445835 563344 200331 515757 618929 591588 869714 153147 102115 159058 932637 957048 374761 004369 602655 742903 901614 027636 638413 875183 307425 989105 > 9139
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (49, 140, 1926)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction |