Information on Result #509662
There is no (23, 143, 509)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 29024 298757 528591 171990 129589 678557 862956 169729 219612 110071 289217 782589 435770 931825 724423 194322 120219 156920 879620 614091 827106 074129 404385 > 9143
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (23, 144, 509)-net in base 9 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (23, 145, 509)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (23, 146, 509)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (23, 147, 509)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (23, 148, 509)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (23, 149, 509)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (23, 150, 509)-net in base 9 | [i] | ||