Information on Result #509882

There is no (56, 148, 2617)-net in base 9, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 9m ≥ 1715 436522 697177 676751 719534 982653 363596 071105 066229 500102 130278 966457 684189 301414 650986 759070 333370 354390 598913 523210 460871 973404 748699 671473 > 9148

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (56, 149, 2617)-net in base 9 [i]m-Reduction