Information on Result #510012
There is no (2, 12, 133)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 287 142013 440976 > 1612
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (2, 13, 133)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |