Information on Result #510080
There is no (3, 25, 173)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 1 284656 257854 408628 443222 237796 > 1625
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (3, 26, 173)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (3, 27, 173)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (3, 28, 173)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (3, 29, 173)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||