Information on Result #511065
There is no (13, 89, 642)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 153883 940089 464001 581340 802873 805527 650045 429300 542942 666725 214088 013648 187811 094773 517258 930208 711813 025216 > 1689
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (13, 90, 642)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |