Information on Result #511951
There is no (17, 121, 826)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 50 713275 565934 892854 162969 661915 172226 070860 960508 355216 719951 933398 076113 695267 032218 986612 524944 476127 044854 568500 099875 805496 911031 751567 519506 > 16121
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (17, 122, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (17, 123, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (17, 124, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (17, 125, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (17, 126, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (17, 127, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (17, 128, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (17, 129, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (17, 130, 826)-net in base 16 | [i] | ||