Information on Result #512054

There is no (32, 124, 2089)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 208493 127094 088145 958825 039250 898753 171389 674911 506637 328536 357049 589977 541748 365581 040307 934355 498747 637027 333881 504377 439672 528567 493566 072064 449536 > 16124

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 125, 2089)-net in base 16 [i]m-Reduction