Information on Result #512219
There is no (33, 129, 2126)-net in base 16, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 16m ≥ 219225 218042 763464 275867 612665 788635 541169 303348 669591 153111 794190 545302 801876 576013 077552 121783 037417 987704 959614 823979 815160 490729 427924 332157 145777 905396 > 16129
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (33, 130, 2126)-net in base 16 | [i] | m-Reduction | |