Information on Result #513504
There is no (12, 98, 1057)-net in base 25, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 25m ≥ 99931 553995 410600 915510 329562 529837 879229 429754 477829 461184 370325 276741 690311 479173 064112 823773 171335 589274 557819 242658 121926 099542 849225 > 2598
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (12, 99, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (12, 100, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (12, 101, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (12, 102, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (12, 103, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (12, 104, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (12, 105, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (12, 106, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (12, 107, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (12, 108, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (12, 109, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (12, 110, 1057)-net in base 25 | [i] | ||