Information on Result #515101
There is no (12, 100, 1166)-net in base 27, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 27m ≥ 139227 860035 388664 012110 347842 662294 336272 284278 382607 203273 557552 549640 797403 335096 981798 089675 474724 518188 290787 516027 421861 168473 362271 137049 > 27100
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (12, 101, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (12, 102, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (12, 103, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (12, 104, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (12, 105, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (12, 106, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (12, 107, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (12, 108, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (12, 109, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (12, 110, 1166)-net in base 27 | [i] | ||