Information on Result #515436

There is no (9, 19, 44058)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 39614 815243 544159 619649 548278 > 3219

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (9, 20, 44058)-net in base 32 [i]m-Reduction