Information on Result #515447
There is no (9, 21, 17899)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 40 569752 733817 404957 936907 586890 > 3221
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 22, 17899)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |