Information on Result #515932
There is no (8, 66, 989)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 2248 090978 138464 211244 539645 817824 613069 910527 621665 003663 411011 203030 559014 861812 228504 440123 556192 > 3266
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (8, 67, 989)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |