Information on Result #516503

There is no (17, 95, 2284)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 98164 443187 665754 797256 512411 117793 528227 944584 924852 772728 954585 506284 964156 388975 079509 910937 799560 185810 300792 451577 107902 112685 955048 755338 > 3295

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (17, 96, 2284)-net in base 32 [i]m-Reduction