Information on Result #516665
There is no (12, 102, 1444)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 3371 113242 975192 558575 952914 297817 288959 606698 338294 782455 533611 787549 576234 426055 692728 757932 175643 230896 656428 048956 972210 900101 646850 886789 315121 558048 > 32102
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (12, 103, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (12, 104, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (12, 105, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (12, 106, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (12, 107, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (12, 108, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (12, 109, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (12, 110, 1444)-net in base 32 | [i] | ||