Information on Result #516715
There is no (14, 104, 1689)-net in base 32, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 32m ≥ 3 511627 338866 801775 792298 323833 603921 373962 280503 619884 898177 035510 373617 844599 728565 275577 604613 584267 816094 209962 467040 489462 727333 271009 332279 228690 118976 > 32104
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (14, 105, 1689)-net in base 32 | [i] | m-Reduction | |