Information on Result #516955
There is no (2, 22, 489)-net in base 49, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 49m ≥ 15 390880 362184 448267 702889 490736 305633 > 4922
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (2, 23, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (2, 24, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
3 | No (2, 25, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
4 | No (2, 26, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
5 | No (2, 27, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
6 | No (2, 28, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
7 | No (2, 29, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
8 | No (2, 30, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
9 | No (2, 31, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
10 | No (2, 32, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
11 | No (2, 33, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
12 | No (2, 34, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
13 | No (2, 35, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
14 | No (2, 36, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
15 | No (2, 37, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
16 | No (2, 38, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
17 | No (2, 39, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
18 | No (2, 40, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
19 | No (2, 41, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
20 | No (2, 42, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
21 | No (2, 43, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
22 | No (2, 44, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
23 | No (2, 45, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
24 | No (2, 46, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
25 | No (2, 47, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
26 | No (2, 48, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
27 | No (2, 49, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
28 | No (2, 50, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
29 | No (2, 51, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
30 | No (2, 52, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
31 | No (2, 53, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
32 | No (2, 54, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] | ||
33 | No (2, 55, 489)-net in base 49 | [i] |