Information on Result #517589
There is no (20, 52, 80028)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 8343 991099 941457 321755 239055 485362 410426 271764 319248 180408 273875 821537 204577 036065 582983 933775 > 6452
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (20, 53, 80028)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction |