Information on Result #517589

There is no (20, 52, 80028)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 8343 991099 941457 321755 239055 485362 410426 271764 319248 180408 273875 821537 204577 036065 582983 933775 > 6452

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (20, 53, 80028)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction