Information on Result #517590
There is no (22, 52, 186138)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 8344 255418 664765 059067 094500 414098 902917 516133 769823 598025 213777 036785 790876 801866 366817 857000 > 6452
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (22, 53, 186138)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction |