Information on Result #517800
There is no (16, 68, 8855)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 661 587212 484701 421573 218291 928390 897309 696877 819781 969361 468927 369384 958242 944852 641495 916908 361758 534145 068117 296788 094736 > 6468
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 69, 8855)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |