Information on Result #517842
There is no (7, 71, 2050)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 174 897932 169508 067743 876617 587590 285846 337967 931902 518582 008107 579166 582962 022693 674485 354050 116658 925641 998863 790174 789817 604032 > 6471
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (7, 72, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (7, 73, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (7, 74, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (7, 75, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (7, 76, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (7, 77, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (7, 78, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (7, 79, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (7, 80, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (7, 81, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (7, 82, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (7, 83, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (7, 84, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (7, 85, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (7, 86, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (7, 87, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 17 | No (7, 88, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 18 | No (7, 89, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 19 | No (7, 90, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||
| 20 | No (7, 91, 2050)-net in base 64 | [i] | ||