Information on Result #518088
There is no (21, 85, 12726)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 3359 954396 167498 987396 444654 632161 507419 767077 383811 540759 862609 240288 151665 995868 530746 235220 049301 079710 976780 435170 487865 236793 482984 891698 050307 311939 > 6485
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 86, 12726)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction | |