Information on Result #518150

There is no (32, 88, 85145)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 878 702876 551373 264282 427048 238482 765675 031462 485647 276526 598718 003744 096245 224689 782034 200451 269168 303595 458585 097302 983188 012478 255566 590587 587899 760011 686304 > 6488

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (32, 89, 85145)-net in base 64 [i]m-Reduction