Information on Result #518150
There is no (32, 88, 85145)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 878 702876 551373 264282 427048 238482 765675 031462 485647 276526 598718 003744 096245 224689 782034 200451 269168 303595 458585 097302 983188 012478 255566 590587 587899 760011 686304 > 6488
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (32, 89, 85145)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction |