Information on Result #518169
There is no (31, 89, 64683)-net in base 64, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 64m ≥ 56242 775265 326584 283387 879771 696843 928902 383353 976529 202729 446519 196522 522382 278258 816300 025858 096704 963729 343744 465876 165306 395281 230290 182947 582072 853374 726960 > 6489
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (31, 90, 64683)-net in base 64 | [i] | m-Reduction |