Information on Result #518994
There is no (8, 16, 4678309)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 5192 300563 095810 056446 667716 444153 > 12816
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (8, 17, 4678309)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |