Information on Result #518998
There is no (2, 18, 1630)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 85 112358 648353 748297 144554 210456 695993 > 12818
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (2, 19, 1630)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |