Information on Result #519053
There is no (3, 29, 2235)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 12 916995 442292 916477 773001 942594 640633 706276 750927 212638 513176 > 12829
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (3, 30, 2235)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |