Information on Result #519093
There is no (3, 35, 2172)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 56 798208 504175 051810 024273 051569 319016 924019 701184 997703 411690 158210 102965 > 12835
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (3, 36, 2172)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |