Information on Result #519096
There is no (9, 35, 21025)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 56 542426 493354 635932 888300 025577 149966 517799 661120 309444 848419 245059 660256 > 12835
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 36, 21025)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |