Information on Result #519142
There is no (9, 41, 13435)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 248 877331 948550 299286 027065 892109 084114 858755 431022 568014 061051 813856 716336 205523 076741 > 12841
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (9, 42, 13435)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction |