Information on Result #519154

There is no (16, 42, 286750)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 31829 714944 924041 819146 940759 949359 621079 978111 221426 335314 106136 281716 859320 633700 446101 > 12842

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (16, 43, 286750)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction