Information on Result #519168
There is no (8, 44, 8411)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 521 686208 705121 155931 200453 326605 773527 456900 028368 679908 603859 271210 047648 934760 661088 007007 > 12844
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (8, 45, 8411)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |