Information on Result #519177
There is no (9, 45, 11016)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 66786 047983 126803 176254 356127 204143 659984 805006 986190 528035 369482 822384 126520 515443 892738 824400 > 12845
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 46, 11016)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |