Information on Result #519204
There is no (4, 48, 2812)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 140417 822584 071944 770460 154931 018936 977601 663247 674921 957406 554173 074207 475708 863843 188087 852394 403654 > 12848
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (4, 49, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (4, 50, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
3 | No (4, 51, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
4 | No (4, 52, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
5 | No (4, 53, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
6 | No (4, 54, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
7 | No (4, 55, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
8 | No (4, 56, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
9 | No (4, 57, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
10 | No (4, 58, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
11 | No (4, 59, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
12 | No (4, 60, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
13 | No (4, 61, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
14 | No (4, 62, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
15 | No (4, 63, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
16 | No (4, 64, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
17 | No (4, 65, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
18 | No (4, 66, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
19 | No (4, 67, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
20 | No (4, 68, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
21 | No (4, 69, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
22 | No (4, 70, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
23 | No (4, 71, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
24 | No (4, 72, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
25 | No (4, 73, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
26 | No (4, 74, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
27 | No (4, 75, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
28 | No (4, 76, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
29 | No (4, 77, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] | ||
30 | No (4, 78, 2812)-net in base 128 | [i] |