Information on Result #519268
There is no (10, 54, 10589)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 615669 857906 068526 258958 252357 071238 483047 326722 564056 403484 184441 012205 478540 184669 005193 344678 702649 623930 244148 > 12854
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (10, 55, 10589)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |