Information on Result #519299

There is no (5, 57, 3448)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 1 292786 971607 867841 675189 158041 192679 960611 914850 254940 704269 950622 106891 470459 066465 914243 847053 416319 142113 082596 363324 > 12857

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (5, 58, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]m-Reduction
2No (5, 59, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
3No (5, 60, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
4No (5, 61, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
5No (5, 62, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
6No (5, 63, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
7No (5, 64, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
8No (5, 65, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
9No (5, 66, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
10No (5, 67, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
11No (5, 68, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
12No (5, 69, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
13No (5, 70, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
14No (5, 71, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
15No (5, 72, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
16No (5, 73, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
17No (5, 74, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
18No (5, 75, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
19No (5, 76, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
20No (5, 77, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]
21No (5, 78, 3448)-net in base 128 [i]