Information on Result #519456
There is no (21, 69, 88254)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 24 979835 303318 943275 926671 818658 764228 157334 495727 939476 767038 362934 149185 681665 222106 216737 434072 474158 758935 734672 265847 389360 225364 284202 069753 > 12869
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (21, 70, 88254)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |