Information on Result #519478
There is no (9, 71, 6538)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 410229 204533 269064 431655 596484 917484 377484 757279 571907 183894 186473 347697 480989 660055 050841 307226 970205 049361 387836 299257 039315 637197 942710 879868 797120 > 12871
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 72, 6538)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |