Information on Result #519495
There is no (16, 72, 23307)-net in base 128, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 128m ≥ 52 376629 052468 811223 824606 581239 485597 980282 675178 929784 989060 254900 701852 444094 376262 037485 926971 463545 976912 623736 284314 044014 771097 262764 460433 627072 > 12872
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (16, 73, 23307)-net in base 128 | [i] | m-Reduction | |