Information on Result #519678
There is no (9, 29, 171128)-net in base 256, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 6901 837250 904515 249474 786262 029022 162091 925574 106612 557017 680528 542526 > 25629
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (9, 30, 171128)-net in base 256 | [i] | m-Reduction | |