Information on Result #519845
There is no (4, 52, 6337)-net in base 256, because the generalized Rao bound for nets shows that 256m ≥ 169244 155708 553255 294976 405607 899118 111214 292577 191883 929927 665576 070593 503551 589069 342517 813343 998703 448577 013589 239702 117016 > 25652
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (4, 53, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (4, 54, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (4, 55, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (4, 56, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (4, 57, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (4, 58, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (4, 59, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (4, 60, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (4, 61, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (4, 62, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (4, 63, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (4, 64, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (4, 65, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 14 | No (4, 66, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 15 | No (4, 67, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||
| 16 | No (4, 68, 6337)-net in base 256 | [i] | ||