Information on Result #520073
There is no (8, 26, 17)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(226, 17, S2, 2, 18), but
- the linear programming bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 6 416681 140224 / 94045 > 226 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
| Result | This result only | Method | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | No (8, 27, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
| 2 | No (8, 28, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 3 | No (8, 29, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 4 | No (8, 30, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 5 | No (8, 31, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 6 | No (8, 32, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 7 | No (8, 33, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 8 | No (8, 34, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 9 | No (8, 35, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 10 | No (8, 36, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 11 | No (8, 37, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 12 | No (8, 38, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
| 13 | No (8, 39, 17)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||