Information on Result #520107
There is no (11, 33, 22)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(233, 22, S2, 2, 22), but
- the linear programming bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 192877 381548 009288 892416 / 19 614878 395771 > 233 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (11, 34, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (11, 35, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (11, 36, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (11, 37, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (11, 38, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (11, 39, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (11, 40, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (11, 41, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (11, 42, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (11, 43, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (11, 44, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (11, 45, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (11, 46, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (11, 47, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (11, 48, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (11, 49, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (11, 50, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (11, 51, 22)-net in base 2 | [i] |