Information on Result #520135
There is no (15, 49, 27)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(249, 27, S2, 2, 34), but
- the (dual) Plotkin bound for OOAs shows that M ≥ 4503 599627 370496 / 7 > 249 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (15, 50, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (15, 51, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (15, 52, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (15, 53, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (15, 54, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (15, 55, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (15, 56, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (15, 57, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (15, 58, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (15, 59, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (15, 60, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (15, 61, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (15, 62, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (15, 63, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (15, 64, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (15, 65, 27)-net in base 2 | [i] |