Information on Result #520163

There is no (19, 103, 28)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2103, 28, S2, 4, 84), but

Mode: Bound.

Optimality

Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.

Other Results with Identical Parameters

None.

Depending Results

The following results depend on this result:

ResultThis
result
only
Method
1No (19, 104, 28)-net in base 2 [i]m-Reduction
2No (19, 105, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
3No (19, 106, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
4No (19, 107, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
5No (19, 108, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
6No (19, 109, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
7No (19, 110, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
8No (19, 111, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
9No (19, 112, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
10No (19, 113, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
11No (19, 114, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
12No (19, 115, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
13No (19, 116, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
14No (19, 117, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
15No (19, 118, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
16No (19, 119, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
17No (19, 120, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
18No (19, 121, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
19No (19, 122, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
20No (19, 123, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
21No (19, 124, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
22No (19, 125, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
23No (19, 126, 28)-net in base 2 [i]
24No (19, 127, 28)-net in base 2 [i]