Information on Result #520163
There is no (19, 103, 28)-net in base 2, because extracting embedded OOA would yield OOA(2103, 28, S2, 4, 84), but
- the LP bound with quadratic polynomials shows that M ≥ 55 776626 410042 093665 854941 036544 / 5 > 2103 [i]
Mode: Bound.
Optimality
Show details for fixed k and m, k and s, k and t, m and s, m and t, t and s.
Other Results with Identical Parameters
None.
Depending Results
The following results depend on this result:
Result | This result only | Method | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | No (19, 104, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | m-Reduction | |
2 | No (19, 105, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
3 | No (19, 106, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
4 | No (19, 107, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
5 | No (19, 108, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
6 | No (19, 109, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
7 | No (19, 110, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
8 | No (19, 111, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
9 | No (19, 112, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
10 | No (19, 113, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
11 | No (19, 114, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
12 | No (19, 115, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
13 | No (19, 116, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
14 | No (19, 117, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
15 | No (19, 118, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
16 | No (19, 119, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
17 | No (19, 120, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
18 | No (19, 121, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
19 | No (19, 122, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
20 | No (19, 123, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
21 | No (19, 124, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
22 | No (19, 125, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
23 | No (19, 126, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] | ||
24 | No (19, 127, 28)-net in base 2 | [i] |